No table of contents available
Vietnam attracts a growing number of foreign professionals, entrepreneurs, and investors. Along with legitimate opportunities, however, there are also cases where foreigners are deceived, defrauded, or financially harmed in business transactions, investments, or personal dealings.
When this happens, one of the most confusing questions foreign victims face is:
Should I file a criminal complaint, or should I initiate a civil lawsuit in Vietnam?
Choosing the wrong legal path can waste time, increase costs, and even weaken your chances of recovery. Understanding the difference between criminal and civil remedies is therefore essential.
Vietnamese law clearly distinguishes between civil disputes and criminal offenses, but the boundary is not always obvious—especially for foreigners unfamiliar with local legal practice.
Many foreign victims:
Assume fraud is always a criminal matter
Expect the police to recover money automatically
File complaints without sufficient evidence
Miss deadlines for civil claims while waiting for criminal results
A strategic legal assessment at the beginning often determines whether the case succeeds or fails.
A civil lawsuit focuses on resolving disputes between private parties.
Civil action is usually appropriate when the case involves:
Breach of contract
Failure to perform agreed obligations
Misrepresentation without clear criminal intent
Disputes over payments, shares, or services
In civil proceedings, the court examines whether one party violated legal or contractual obligations and whether compensation is owed.
Through a civil lawsuit, foreign victims may seek:
Refund of paid money
Compensation for damages
Enforcement of contractual rights
Cancellation or invalidation of transactions
Civil cases are often suitable when documentation exists and the dispute centers on performance or payment, rather than intentional deception.
However, civil lawsuits have limitations:
No criminal investigation powers
No arrest or detention of the wrongdoer
Enforcement depends on the defendant’s assets
If the wrongdoer has already hidden assets or acted fraudulently, civil remedies alone may not be sufficient.
A criminal complaint is appropriate when the conduct involves intentional deception or fraud, not just a failed business deal.
Criminal proceedings may be considered when:
Fake identities or forged documents are used
Money is collected with no intention to perform
Assets are misappropriated
Multiple victims are involved
The conduct shows clear criminal intent
In such cases, the matter is no longer a private dispute—it becomes a violation of criminal law.
Criminal complaints can:
Trigger police investigation
Apply strong pressure on the wrongdoer
Freeze assets or accounts
Support recovery through restitution
For foreign victims, criminal proceedings often serve as a powerful leverage tool—especially when the offender attempts to evade responsibility.
Despite its perceived strength, criminal action is not always the right first step.
Common risks include:
Authorities refusing to accept the case as criminal
Long investigation timelines
Limited victim control over proceedings
No guarantee of financial recovery
If criminal intent cannot be clearly proven, the complaint may be rejected, causing delays and frustration.
The core difference lies in intent.
Civil cases focus on whether obligations were breached
Criminal cases focus on whether there was intentional deception from the beginning
Many foreign victims misunderstand this distinction and expect criminal remedies for what are legally civil disputes.
In some situations, both civil and criminal paths may be pursued, but not blindly.
A well-structured legal strategy may involve:
Filing a criminal complaint to preserve evidence or apply pressure
Initiating a civil claim to recover money or enforce rights
Coordinating both actions to avoid procedural conflicts
This requires careful legal planning. Poorly coordinated actions may weaken both cases.
Foreign victims often face unfavorable outcomes because:
Legal action is taken too late
Evidence is informal or incomplete
Wrong procedures are chosen
Communication with authorities is ineffective
Vietnamese courts and investigators rely heavily on formal documentation and legal structure—not personal narratives or moral arguments.
Vietnamese law imposes strict limitation periods for civil claims and criminal complaints.
Delays may result in:
Loss of legal rights
Inability to recover assets
Reduced chances of case acceptance
Early legal consultation is crucial to preserve all available options.
Many foreigners attempt to:
Negotiate directly with the wrongdoer
File complaints without legal guidance
Rely on translators or intermediaries
These approaches often backfire and create procedural weaknesses that are difficult to fix later.
Cross-border disputes require local legal expertise combined with international communication skills.
For foreign clients, it is essential to work with a law firm that:
Understands both civil and criminal law in Vietnam
Has experience representing foreign individuals and companies
Communicates clearly in English and other languages
Understands cultural and commercial expectations
The right legal partner helps foreign clients make strategic decisions, not emotional ones.
When foreigners are deceived in Vietnam, the choice between criminal complaint and civil lawsuit is not always obvious—but it is decisive.
The correct approach depends on:
The nature of the conduct
Evidence of intent
Recovery objectives
Timing and enforcement feasibility
By seeking early advice from a law firm experienced with international clients, foreign victims can protect their rights and avoid costly legal mistakes.
📞 Hotline: (+84) 39 969 0012 (Available via WhatsApp, WeChat, Zalo)
🕒 Working Hours: Monday – Friday (8:30 – 18:00)
Contact us today for a free initial consultation with our experienced lawyers!
Select a platform to view details
