When investing in Vietnam, FDI enterprises often face risks related to contract disputes, capital contribution, corporate governance, or conflicts with local partners. Should disputes be resolved through courts or arbitration? Which mechanism offers better protection and lower risks?
As Vietnam’s investment environment continues to expand, the number of foreign-invested enterprises has increased rapidly, making legal disputes more common. The key issue is not whether disputes arise, but whether FDI enterprises have prepared an appropriate dispute resolution mechanism in advance.
Many investors only become concerned once disputes have already occurred. At that stage, unclear contractual clauses or inappropriate dispute resolution choices from the outset may lead to significant loss of time, costs, and even control over the case.
FDI disputes in Vietnam often involve familiar issues that carry substantial risks if not handled properly. These include commercial contract disputes with Vietnamese partners, disputes over capital contributions among investors, internal corporate governance conflicts, and disputes related to project or share transfers.
In many cases, FDI enterprises are placed in a passive position due to limited understanding of Vietnam’s legal system, resulting in a lack of strategic planning when choosing dispute resolution mechanisms.
Dispute resolution mechanisms affect not only case outcomes but also corporate reputation, business operations, and long-term relationships. An inappropriate choice may cause disputes to last for years, disrupt cash flow, and erode trust with partners and clients.
Therefore, for FDI enterprises, selecting a dispute resolution mechanism at the contract-signing stage is a critical component of legal risk management.
FDI enterprises in Vietnam typically consider three main mechanisms: courts, commercial arbitration, and mediation. Each has its own advantages and limitations depending on specific objectives and circumstances.
Courts are a traditional mechanism with strong enforcement power. Court judgments are enforced by state authority, making them suitable for cases where one party refuses to cooperate.
However, for FDI enterprises, Vietnamese courts are not always the optimal choice. Court procedures are often lengthy, public, and strictly governed by procedural laws, raising concerns over confidentiality and opportunity costs caused by prolonged proceedings.
Commercial arbitration has become increasingly preferred by FDI enterprises investing in Vietnam. Its key advantages include flexibility, confidentiality, and the ability to select arbitrators with specialized expertise.
For contracts involving foreign elements, arbitral awards also enjoy advantages in recognition and enforcement across multiple jurisdictions under international conventions, which is particularly important for FDI enterprises with cross-border assets or operations.
However, arbitration is only effective when clearly agreed upon in contracts. Poorly drafted arbitration clauses may lead to jurisdictional disputes, resulting in wasted time and additional costs.
Mediation is based on voluntary participation and goodwill between parties. For less intense disputes, mediation helps FDI enterprises preserve business relationships and reduce legal costs.
Nevertheless, mediation lacks strong enforceability. If one party acts in bad faith, mediated outcomes may not be implemented. As such, mediation is often suitable as a pre-litigation step rather than a final solution for complex disputes.
There is no “one-size-fits-all” dispute resolution mechanism. FDI enterprises must clearly understand their objectives, risk levels, and transaction contexts to make appropriate choices.
FDI enterprises should consider confidentiality, resolution time, enforceability of decisions, and legal costs. For high-value contracts with significant foreign elements, commercial arbitration is often a safer option.
Conversely, for simpler disputes of lower value or those requiring strong enforcement measures, Vietnamese courts may still be worth considering.
Many disputes become complicated not due to their nature but because of poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses. Engaging corporate lawyers during negotiation and contract execution helps FDI enterprises avoid potential legal pitfalls.
DEDICA Law regularly assists FDI enterprises in reviewing and drafting dispute resolution clauses in compliance with Vietnamese law and international practices, ensuring maximum protection when risks arise.
With extensive experience in advising and handling disputes for FDI enterprises, DEDICA understands that each case requires a tailored strategy. Beyond dispute representation, DEDICA focuses on risk prevention, helping enterprises select the right mechanisms from the outset to save time and costs in the long term.
Are you an FDI enterprise concerned about dispute risks in Vietnam?
Do not wait until disputes arise to seek solutions.
Contact DEDICA Law to find the most suitable legal strategy for your business.
📞 Hotline: (+84) 39 969 0012 (WhatsApp, WeChat & Zalo available)
🕒 Working hours: Monday – Friday (8:30 AM – 6:00 PM)
Contact us now for a free initial consultation with our professional lawyers.
Select a platform to view details
