No table of contents available
Drafting contracts in Vietnam may seem like a simple formality—but why do so many foreign businesses still lose their deposits? Where do the real risks lie, and can they be prevented from the start?
When working with Vietnamese partners, many companies from the US, EU, or Korea encounter the same situation: they transfer a deposit, but the supplier fails to deliver goods, delays performance, or stops responding altogether.
What’s more concerning is that when a dispute arises, they often lack a strong legal mechanism to protect their interests.
The problem is not only the partner—it lies in the contract itself.

In practice, many contracts used by foreign businesses in Vietnam contain common issues:
Under the Vietnam Civil Code 2015, deposits are only clearly regulated when explicitly agreed upon by the parties. Without detailed provisions, recovering the deposit becomes extremely difficult.
Many businesses assume that “a deposit must be refunded if the other party breaches”—but Vietnamese law does not automatically guarantee this. Everything depends on the contract.
A major reason US companies face risks in Vietnam is:
For example, under the Vietnam Commercial Law 2005, contractual penalties are generally capped at 8% of the value of the breached obligation. If this is not properly understood, companies may include “strong” penalty clauses that are not enforceable in practice.
This is the question most foreign businesses ask after a problem arises.
The practical answer: You can file a lawsuit, but recovery is not always guaranteed.
A contract dispute in Vietnam may take:
Meanwhile, the deposit amount may not justify the total cost of litigation.
As a result, many businesses ultimately decide not to pursue legal action.
This is especially common when:
Even if you obtain a favorable judgment, recovering the money can still be challenging:
This is a reality that many foreign businesses do not anticipate.
From a lawyer’s perspective, the real question is not “Should you sue?”—but rather: Could this dispute have been prevented from the beginning?

Based on extensive experience handling contracts and disputes:
Prevention is always more cost-effective than litigation.
A well-drafted contract should carefully address the following:
1. Payment & Deposit Terms
2. Penalty & Damages Clauses
3. Termination Clause
4. Dispute Resolution Clause
5. Performance Obligations & Standards
A good contract is not necessarily long—it is one that is structured to handle worst-case scenarios.
Many businesses only engage lawyers after problems arise. In reality:
The cost of contract review is usually minimal compared to litigation costs.
This is why many international companies choose ongoing legal support instead of handling issues case by case.
In Vietnam, DEDICA Law Firm has assisted many foreign companies in:
DEDICA’s approach stands out because:
We understand that for foreign businesses, an unclear contract is not just a legal risk—it directly impacts cost, operations, and reputation.
Important Disclaimer
Each contract and dispute has its own specific circumstances. This article is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Businesses should consult qualified legal counsel before making important decisions.
📞 Hotline: (+84) 39 969 0012 (Available via WhatsApp, WeChat, Zalo)
🕒 Working Hours: Monday – Friday (8:30 – 18:00)
Contact us today for a free initial consultation with our experienced lawyers!

Select a platform to view details