No table of contents available
Construction disputes are one of the most costly and disruptive risks for businesses operating in Vietnam. Delays, payment conflicts, defective works, and contract termination issues can quickly escalate into prolonged legal battles that stall projects and drain resources.
For foreign investors and contractors, the challenge is even greater due to differences in legal systems, language, and local construction practices.
The key question is not how to win construction disputes—but how to avoid them safely in the first place.
Vietnam’s construction sector is fast-moving and highly competitive. Disputes often arise not from bad faith, but from structural weaknesses in contract management and legal compliance.
Common causes include:
Vague or incomplete construction contracts
Informal project changes without documentation
Payment milestones not clearly linked to progress
Unclear roles between main contractors and subcontractors
Weak contract administration during execution
Once disputes arise, correcting these problems becomes far more difficult and expensive.
Many construction disputes can be traced back to poorly drafted contracts.
A safe construction contract in Vietnam should:
Clearly define scope of work and responsibilities
Allocate risks realistically
Specify payment conditions and deadlines
Address delays, variations, and termination rights
Include enforceable dispute resolution mechanisms
Using generic or foreign contract templates without localization often creates hidden legal risks.
One of the most overlooked risk factors is contractor qualification.
Before signing any construction contract, investors should ensure:
The contractor holds valid construction licenses
The license scope matches the project type
Subcontracting arrangements comply with Vietnamese law
Working with unqualified or improperly licensed contractors can result in contract unenforceability, project suspension, or administrative penalties.
Changes are inevitable in construction projects—but unmanaged changes are a major dispute trigger.
To reduce risk:
All variations should be documented in writing
Approval authority should be clearly defined
Cost and time impact should be assessed before execution
Verbal instructions or informal site approvals frequently become the weakest point in disputes.
Payment disputes are among the most common construction conflicts in Vietnam.
Safe practices include:
Linking payments to verifiable milestones
Defining clear acceptance and inspection procedures
Using retention and guarantees appropriately
Issuing formal notices for delayed payments
Unclear payment structures often lead to cash-flow disputes that escalate quickly.
Vietnamese courts and arbitral tribunals rely heavily on written evidence.
To protect legal positions:
Keep records of site meetings and instructions
Confirm key communications in writing
Maintain acceptance and handover documents
Good documentation often determines the outcome of construction disputes.
Suspending or terminating a construction contract is one of the highest-risk actions a party can take.
Unsafe termination often occurs when:
Notices are not issued properly
Cure periods are ignored
Termination is based on minor breaches
Improper suspension or termination can expose the terminating party to compensation claims—even if the other party is at fault.
Dispute resolution mechanisms should not be treated as boilerplate clauses.
Key considerations include:
Arbitration versus court litigation
Location and enforceability of awards
Language of proceedings
Choosing the wrong dispute forum can significantly delay resolution and increase costs.
Many businesses only involve lawyers after disputes escalate.
By then:
Evidence may be incomplete
Informal practices weaken legal positions
Negotiation leverage is reduced
Dispute prevention is almost always more cost-effective than dispute resolution.
Construction projects evolve continuously. A contract that was legally sound at signing can become outdated within months.
Without ongoing legal oversight:
Contracts drift away from reality
Risks accumulate unnoticed
Disputes become inevitable
This is why many construction disputes appear “unexpected” to management.
With ongoing legal consultancy, businesses can:
Identify legal risks early
Align contracts with actual project execution
Manage variations and payments properly
Make informed decisions before conflicts escalate
This proactive approach significantly reduces the likelihood and severity of disputes.
Foreign investors face additional challenges:
Unfamiliarity with Vietnamese construction regulations
Language and documentation issues
Dependence on local contractors
Continuous legal support bridges these gaps and provides practical risk control.
DEDICA provides ongoing legal consultancy services for construction projects and FDI investments in Vietnam, focusing on dispute prevention rather than reactive litigation.
DEDICA supports clients by:
Reviewing and structuring construction contracts
Advising on licensing and compliance
Supporting contract administration and variation management
Identifying dispute risks early
Representing clients if disputes cannot be avoided
DEDICA’s approach prioritizes legal safety, enforceability, and commercial efficiency.
Construction disputes in Vietnam are not inevitable—but they are predictable when risks are ignored.
By focusing on proper contract drafting, compliance, documentation, and continuous legal oversight, businesses can significantly reduce dispute exposure.
Engaging ongoing legal consultancy allows companies to:
Prevent disputes before they arise
Protect project timelines and budgets
Maintain stronger negotiating positions
Safeguard long-term investments
📞 Hotline: (+84) 39 969 0012 (Available via WhatsApp, WeChat, Zalo)
🕒 Working Hours: Monday – Friday (8:30 – 18:00)
Contact us today for a free initial consultation with our experienced lawyers!
Select a platform to view details
