Paid in Advance but No Goods from Vietnam Supplier?

20/01/2026

Table of Contents

Advance payment is a common practice in commercial transactions with Vietnamese partners, especially in manufacturing, trading, sourcing, and service contracts. However, many foreign companies eventually face a difficult situation: payment has been made, but the goods are not delivered.

The supplier delays, provides excuses, partially performs, or stops responding altogether. At this point, businesses often feel stuck—unsure whether to wait, negotiate, or escalate the matter legally.

This article explains what foreign businesses should do when advance payment is made but goods are not delivered in Vietnam, and how legal strategy can significantly affect recovery outcomes.

This Is a Common Risk in Vietnam Trade Transactions

Advance payment arrangements are frequently used in Vietnam due to:

  • Production financing needs

  • Custom manufacturing or sourcing models

  • Long supply chains and subcontracting

While many transactions are completed properly, disputes arise when:

  • Suppliers encounter financial difficulties

  • Production is delayed or cancelled

  • Goods are diverted to other buyers

  • The supplier lacks capacity but still accepts payment

Without early legal control, these cases can quickly turn into high-risk non-recovery situations.

ảnh website dedica - 2026-01-20T102251.779.webp

First Mistake to Avoid: Waiting Too Long

Many foreign companies delay action because they hope the supplier will eventually deliver. Unfortunately, waiting too long often:

  • Weakens legal leverage

  • Allows assets to disappear

  • Makes enforcement more difficult

Silence or informal extensions may later be interpreted as acceptance of delay. The earlier legal assessment is made, the more options remain available.

Step One: Review the Contract and Payment Structure

Before taking any action, the contract must be reviewed carefully.

Key issues include:

  • Whether delivery deadlines are clearly defined

  • Whether advance payment conditions are linked to milestones

  • Remedies for late or non-delivery

  • Termination and refund provisions

  • Penalty or damage clauses

  • Governing law and dispute resolution mechanism

Many foreign companies discover too late that contracts are vague or poorly adapted to Vietnamese enforcement practice.

Step Two: Determine Whether Non-Delivery Is a Legal Breach

Not every delay automatically qualifies as a legal breach.

Under Vietnamese law, factors such as:

  • Grace periods

  • Agreed extensions

  • Force majeure clauses

  • Partial performance

may affect whether the supplier is legally in breach.

A legal assessment helps determine:

  • Whether formal breach has occurred

  • Whether notice is required

  • Which remedies are available

This step is critical before escalation.

Step Three: Secure and Organize Evidence Immediately

Evidence is often the weakest point in non-delivery disputes.

Foreign companies frequently lack:

  • Formal delivery confirmations

  • Clear acceptance or rejection records

  • Structured communication history

Once disputes escalate, missing evidence can seriously undermine recovery.

Early legal guidance helps ensure:

  • Payment records are clearly documented

  • Non-delivery is formally recorded

  • Communications are legally safe

Step Four: Send a Proper Legal Notice, Not Just a Reminder

Repeated informal reminders rarely solve non-delivery problems.

A proper legal notice should:

  • Clearly state the breach

  • Demand performance or refund

  • Set a firm deadline

  • Preserve termination and claim rights

Poorly drafted notices—or none at all—often weaken later claims in court or arbitration.

This step alone resolves many disputes when done correctly.

Step Five: Avoid Informal Renegotiation Without Legal Structure

Suppliers may propose:

  • New delivery schedules

  • Partial delivery

  • Future compensation

While negotiation can be useful, informal renegotiation may:

  • Reset contractual obligations

  • Waive original breach

  • Reduce refund or damage claims

Legal oversight ensures renegotiation protects, rather than sacrifices, your position.

Step Six: Assess Enforcement Feasibility Early

Before filing a lawsuit or arbitration claim, businesses must assess enforcement reality.

Key questions include:

  • Does the supplier have assets in Vietnam?

  • Are those assets traceable?

  • Is arbitration or court the better forum?

A legal victory without enforcement often leads to zero commercial recovery.

Enforcement strategy should be considered before formal proceedings begin.

Step Seven: Choose the Correct Dispute Resolution Mechanism

Depending on the contract, disputes may be resolved through:

  • Commercial arbitration

  • Vietnamese courts

Choosing the wrong forum can lead to dismissal, delay, and wasted cost.

Legal advice is essential to avoid jurisdictional and procedural errors.

Why Many Foreign Companies Fail to Recover Advance Payments

In practice, recovery often fails because:

  • Legal action is taken too late

  • Contracts are poorly drafted

  • Evidence is weak or informal

  • Enforcement is not planned

These failures are usually preventable with early legal involvement.

Why Case-by-Case Legal Support Is Often Ineffective

Many businesses only hire lawyers after the situation becomes critical.

This reactive approach leads to:

  • Higher legal costs

  • Limited strategic options

  • Repeated disputes with different suppliers

Advance-payment risk is rarely a one-time issue.

How Ongoing Legal Consultancy Prevents These Situations

Ongoing legal consultancy allows businesses to:

  • Structure advance payment terms safely

  • Monitor supplier performance

  • Intervene early when warning signs appear

  • Preserve leverage before disputes escalate

Instead of reacting to crises, businesses manage risk proactively.

ảnh website dedica - 2026-01-20T102714.966.webp

Especially Important for Trading, Manufacturing, and Sourcing Companies

Companies that regularly pay Vietnamese suppliers in advance face cumulative risk.

Without continuous legal oversight:

  • Small delays turn into major losses

  • Recovery becomes harder over time

  • Legal exposure grows unnoticed

Preventive legal management is essential for sustainable operations.

How DEDICA Law Firm Supports Non-Delivery Disputes

DEDICA provides ongoing legal consultancy services and dispute support for foreign and FDI companies facing non-delivery after advance payment.

DEDICA assists clients by:

  • Reviewing and structuring advance payment contracts

  • Assessing breach and refund options

  • Drafting legal notices and negotiation strategy

  • Representing clients in arbitration and Vietnamese courts

  • Advising on enforcement and asset recovery

DEDICA’s approach focuses on early intervention, enforceability, and cost control, not prolonged disputes.

Conclusion

Paying a Vietnamese partner in advance but not receiving goods is a serious commercial risk—but it does not have to result in total loss.

The outcome depends on:

  • How early legal strategy is applied

  • How contracts and evidence are handled

  • Whether enforcement is planned from the start

By engaging ongoing legal consultancy, businesses can significantly improve recovery prospects, reduce repeat risk, and protect long-term commercial interests.

Contact DEDICA Law Firm for Professional Legal Support

📞 Hotline: (+84) 39 969 0012 (Available via WhatsApp, WeChat, Zalo)

🕒 Working Hours: Monday – Friday (8:30 – 18:00)

Contact us today for a free initial consultation with our experienced lawyers!

Hoi An Ancient Town at Night

Connect with DEDICA

Select a platform to view details

LinkedInTikTokFacebookYouTube