Disputes Over Separate Property During Marriage in Vietnam
In marital and family disputes, most people focus on dividing common property upon divorce. However, issues surrounding separate property can also become a “hot spot” of conflict—especially when one spouse seeks to protect their personal ownership rights against the other’s demand for division. This article provides an updated and detailed look at how to identify and resolve disputes over separate property during marriage under current Vietnamese law.
1. Separate Property During Marriage — Definition and Legal Basis
1.1. Definition of Separate Property
The 2014 Law on Marriage and Family clearly defines the categories of property that belong solely to a husband or wife. Separate property includes:
Property owned by each person before marriage.
Property inherited by one spouse during the marriage.
Property given to one spouse as a gift during the marriage.
Property divided separately between spouses by agreement.
Property serving personal needs of each spouse and other personal rights attached to the individual.
It should be noted that if property is formed during marriage and there is no clear evidence proving it is separate, the law presumes it to be common property.
1.2. Rights of Possession, Use, and Disposal of Separate Property
Once identified as separate property, the owner has the right to:
Possess, use, and dispose of it independently without the other’s consent.
Decide whether to “merge” their separate property into the common property (based on mutual agreement).
In cases where a spouse cannot manage their own property and has not authorized another person, the other spouse may manage it but must ensure the owner’s interests are protected.
However, disposal of separate property may be restricted in special cases—for instance, if it is the only residence or the main source of family income—requiring the other spouse’s consent.
2. When Can Separate Property Be Combined Into Common Property?
Although separate property belongs solely to one person, the law allows it to be merged into common property by mutual agreement between husband and wife.
Specifically:
The merger must be based on a clear agreement between the spouses, which can cover all or part of the property.
Once merged, any transactions related to that property must comply with the legal form requirements (e.g., notarization or certification if required).
Any obligations arising from the merged property are to be performed with common property, unless otherwise agreed by the spouses.
If a dispute arises and no agreement can be proven, the court will evaluate evidence regarding the property’s origin to determine whether it should be recognized as common property.
3. Common Disputes Over Separate Property and How to Resolve Them
3.1. Clear-Origin Property But the Other Spouse Requests Division
Example: One spouse owns a house gifted exclusively by their parents (with a written gift contract and ownership certificate in their name). The other spouse later requests a division.
The party requesting division must prove that the house is not separate property—for example, by showing it was intentionally merged into common property. If they cannot, the court will uphold the exclusive ownership.
However, if the other spouse can prove they contributed effort or capital to enhance the property’s value, they may be entitled to compensation for their contribution from the common assets—but not to a share of the separate property itself.
3.2. Common Property Disguised as Separate Property
Example: A piece of land purchased during marriage is titled solely in the name of one spouse.
Under Article 34 of the Law on Marriage and Family, if property is common but registered in one spouse’s name, that person must prove it is separate property. If they cannot, it will be deemed common property.
Without sufficient proof of separate ownership, the court will treat the asset as common and divide it accordingly.
3.3. Mixing Separate Property With Common Property
Example: The husband owns a private house or savings account, while the wife uses her separate funds to renovate the family home or invest jointly.
When disputes arise and separate and common property are “mixed,” the separate property owner may request compensation equivalent to their contribution’s value.
The other spouse cannot demand a share of the original separate asset but may claim a share of the increased value resulting from joint contributions.
4. Principles and Procedures for Resolving Separate Property Disputes
4.1. Principle of Protecting Individual Ownership
When resolving disputes, courts consistently affirm that proven separate property remains with its rightful owner—unless there is evidence of merger or a contrary agreement.
If evidence is unclear or conflicting, the disputed portion will be treated as common property rather than automatically recognized as separate.
4.2. Legal Procedure for Court Resolution
If spouses cannot reach an agreement, one party may file a lawsuit in the family and civil court under Article 28 of the Civil Procedure Code.
The petition must specify the property in dispute, its origin, and supporting evidence (e.g., gift contracts, wills, pre-marriage documents, invoices, or bank records).
The court will conduct conciliation before trial. If reconciliation fails, the case proceeds to adjudication under the law.
During the trial, the court will verify and evaluate the evidence to determine which assets are separate and what portion, if any, requires value compensation.
The final court judgment serves as the binding legal basis for enforcement of rights and obligations.
5. Practical Notes and Experience
Preserve evidence early: Keep documents such as private gift contracts, pre-marriage ownership certificates, and personal bank statements—they are key to protecting separate property later.
Clear agreements: If spouses wish to merge or define ownership of assets, they should formalize it in writing (notarized if required) to avoid future disputes.
Clarify the property’s origin: Avoid using separate property for joint transactions without clear delineation.
When assets are mixed: Always document contributions. If the separate property cannot cover personal obligations, only then may common assets be used under the law.
Seek legal advice early: Even small disagreements about assets should be discussed with a lawyer to prevent escalation into major disputes.
Contact DEDICA Law Firm for expert legal consultation!
📞 Hotline: (+84) 39 969 0012 (Available on WhatsApp, WeChat, and Zalo)
🏢 Head Office: 144 Vo Van Tan Street, Xuan Hoa Ward, Ho Chi Minh City (144 Vo Van Tan Street, Vo Thi Sau Ward, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City)
🕒 Business Hours: Monday – Friday (8:30 AM – 6:00 PM)
Reach out today for a free initial consultation with our team of professional lawyers!
