Procedures for Resolving Credit Contract Disputes with Foreign Banks in Vietnam

Credit contract disputes between borrowers in Vietnam and foreign banks (or foreign credit institutions) have become increasingly common as cross-border lending, FDI financing, and international financial transactions expand. The choice of dispute resolution procedure (negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or court litigation) and understanding the barriers to enforcing foreign judgments are decisive factors in debt recovery, protecting legal rights, and minimizing legal risks in Vietnam.

1. Preliminary steps before initiating court proceedings or arbitration

Carefully review the contract: identify the dispute resolution authority (court or arbitration), choice-of-law clauses, provisions on secured assets, guarantees, interest rates, penalties, and termination conditions. If the contract stipulates foreign arbitration or foreign law, the enforceability of the arbitral award in Vietnam must be evaluated.

Collect evidence and financial records: transaction statements, credit contracts and annexes, repayment documents, minutes of contractual breaches, mortgage contracts, and relevant correspondence. The clearer the documentation, the higher the chances of prevailing and enforcing the outcome.

Negotiation and mediation (if feasible): this is the least costly and should remain a priority. Many credit disputes can be resolved through loan restructuring negotiations, revised repayment schedules, or debt transfers. All agreements should be recorded in writing with signatures and clear enforcement terms.

2. Choice of dispute resolution: arbitration or court?

2.1. Commercial Arbitration

Advantages: faster, confidential, specialized in commercial matters, and arbitral awards can be enforced in many countries under the 1958 New York Convention (if issued by an arbitral tribunal of a member state). However, when an award is rendered by a foreign arbitral tribunal, enforcement in Vietnam requires recognition and permission from a Vietnamese court in accordance with civil procedure law.

Limitations with foreign banks: if the contract involves secured assets located in Vietnam (e.g., real estate, business assets), enforcement of the award still requires Vietnamese court procedures. Where the borrower is a non-commercial entity or a household, certain disputes may fall under the jurisdiction of civil courts.

2.2. Vietnamese Courts

Advantages: when disputes directly involve assets located in Vietnam (mortgaged property, asset seizure), Vietnamese courts have authority to enforce compulsory judgments. If the contract specifies Vietnamese courts as the competent forum, litigation follows civil/commercial procedure.

Limitations: proceedings are generally lengthier and more expensive than arbitration; if foreign law governs the contract, Vietnamese courts may still adjudicate but will need to determine applicable law and reconcile it with publicized Vietnamese regulations.

3. Litigation process in Vietnamese courts

• Prepare the statement of claim and supporting documents: contracts, evidence, debt summary, demand notices, power of attorney if represented by counsel.

• File with the competent court: usually where the defendant resides or where the disputed property is located. For borrowers registered as enterprises in Vietnam, jurisdiction typically lies with the economic/civil court.

• Court acceptance, mediation (if any), first-instance and appellate hearings: duration depends on the complexity and value of the dispute.

• Enforcement of judgment: once effective, civil judgment enforcement authorities execute asset seizure if the losing party does not comply. If the counterparty is a foreign bank with assets abroad, enforcement must be pursued in the foreign jurisdiction.

4. Arbitration proceedings

• Review the arbitration clause in the contract: identify the arbitration center (e.g., VIAC, SIAC, ICC), applicable law, and language of proceedings.

• File a request for arbitration, appoint arbitrators, and conduct hearings.

• Arbitral award is rendered. To enforce in Vietnam, the winning party must apply for recognition and enforcement by a competent People’s Court. The court will assess conditions under the New York Convention and Vietnamese civil procedure law before granting enforcement.

5. Specific issues in disputes with foreign banks

• Choice of law and recognition of foreign judgments/awards: contracts governed by foreign law or subject to foreign arbitration require assessment of recognition and enforcement prospects in Vietnam. Some decisions may be refused recognition if contrary to public policy or fundamental procedural rules.

• Foreign exchange control and State Bank regulations: foreign currency loans and cross-border repayments may be subject to reporting, registration, or restrictions under prevailing regulations. Debt settlements across borders must comply with the State Bank of Vietnam’s rules on foreign borrowing and repayment.

• Enforcement abroad: if debtor’s assets are located overseas, creditors must initiate enforcement procedures under the laws of the asset’s jurisdiction; legal costs and bilateral frameworks must be considered when planning debt recovery strategies.

6. Practical advice for borrowers and foreign lenders

• Before signing: review arbitration clauses, choice-of-law provisions, and security arrangements; consider adding “minimum mandatory” clauses to facilitate enforcement in Vietnam (e.g., a fallback commitment to litigate in Vietnamese courts).

• When disputes arise: prioritize negotiation and mediation; if litigation is necessary, prepare comprehensive evidence, assess enforcement strategies in both Vietnam and abroad, and retain counsel experienced in cross-border debt recovery.

7. Conclusion

Resolving credit contract disputes with foreign banks in Vietnam requires combining contract analysis, selecting the appropriate resolution mechanism (arbitration or court), and developing a cross-border enforcement strategy. Proper preparation of documentation, leveraging negotiation/mediation, and engaging counsel with international expertise significantly increase the likelihood of protecting rights and expediting debt recovery.

Contact DEDICA Law Firm for expert legal consultation!

📞 Hotline: (+84) 39 969 0012 (Available on WhatsApp, WeChat, and Zalo)

🏢 Head Office: 144 Vo Van Tan Street, Xuan Hoa Ward, Ho Chi Minh City (144 Vo Van Tan Street, Vo Thi Sau Ward, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City)

🕒 Business Hours: Monday – Friday (8:30 AM – 6:00 PM)

Reach out today for a free initial consultation with our team of professional lawyers!